PETE&C Concurrent Session
Dr. Scott Garrigan
http://www.acape.org/garrigans/wkshp/copyright.pdf
plagiarism v. copyright violation
- Section 8, Clause 8 of U.S. Constitution - copyright law
- plagiarism is not part of any U.S. or state law
History
- Copyright is for the public good - according to the U.S. Constitution
- Is a system to keep authors creating, not to give authors special privilege (purpose is progress)
- T. Jefferson suggested a 14-year copyright period for the USA
- new media is considered to have economic value for 7 years
- regarded as an industrial regulation
- restricted publishers
- beneficial to public, easy to enforce, uncontroversial
- Power exercised by authors over publishers for the benefit of the public
- with computer networks it became ordinary readers and viewers were empowered to easily copy and disseminate the works
- publishers requested law to apply to individuals , not just companies
- law is not a power wielded by publishers over the public ostensibly to protect authors, but publishers get most benefit
- now controversial, difficult to enforce, is it beneficial to the public?
- Extending duration of copyright
- Constitution prohibits perpetual copyright
- every 20 years lobbyists extend copyright by 20 years to keep works from public domain
- through "free trade" treaties, US government attempts to impose extended copyright on other nations
- NOW - copyright duration is the life of the author + 70 years
Solution 1: Educate
- Students and teachers should know that their work is automatically protected by copyright (if teachers use a student's work from a prior year as a model, legally they must obtain written permission from the student and student's parents before it can be used)
- classes can study copyright law, traditions, and recent changes
- current events and issues in copyright can be discussed so all stakeholders gain a balanced perspective and a sense of how copyright law is changing
Result:
- appreciation and questioning of the law
Solution 2: Be Creative
- most students IP infringement in written reports and multi-media presentations
- Does curriculum emphasize correctness or creativity?
- assignments could change:
- individual creative work more highly valued
- factual implications of personal value could be emphasized over factual correctness (how does it relate to me, my school, my family?)
Solution 3: Document Process
- written and multi-media projects have discreet phrases which can be documented
- notes, outline, draft, revision
- the process can be taught and guided in class
- peer editing programs can reduce plagiarism
- require submissions of notes, outlines, drafts, and revisions
- evaluate with a rubric that includes process as well as product
Solution 4: Copyright Enhancements
- Creative Commons (http://creativecommons.org/)
- Wikipedia/WikiMedia (http://www.wikipedia.org/)
- Internet Archive (http://www.archive.org/)
- EveryStockPhoto (http://www.everystockphoto.com/)
- YouTube, Flickr, Blip.tv, Owl music
Solution 5: Open Source
- Open OS: Linux
- Open Productivity: OpenOffice, NeoOffice, Abiword, Gnumeric, etc.
- Open Tools: Scribus, Cmap Tools, Audacity
- Open Graphics: GIMP, InkScape, SketchUp
- Open Math / Science: Sage, NetLogic, POV-Ray, Scartch
- Open Web: Google Docs, Zoho, etc.
- Open Content: Freereading,net (FL), Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Library of Congress (government docs are always copyright free, primary sources whose copyrights have expired), MITOpenCourseWare
Technorati Tags: peteandc2008 PETE&C2008 education technology copyright learning schools CreativeCommons






0 comments:
Post a Comment